Determining fair market price (FMV) can be a complicated procedure, as it is highly depending on the particular realities and scenarios surrounding each appraisal task. Appraisers must exercise expert judgment, supported by credible data and sound method, to figure out FMV. This frequently needs cautious analysis of market trends, the accessibility and reliability of equivalent sales, and an understanding of how the residential or commercial property would carry out under common market conditions including a ready purchaser and a willing seller.
marginalia-search.com
This article will resolve determining FMV for the planned usage of taking an income tax reduction for a non-cash charitable contribution in the United States. With that being stated, this method applies to other desired uses. While Canada’s meaning of FMV differs from that in the US, there are lots of similarities that allow this general methodology to be applied to Canadian functions. Part II in this blogpost series will resolve Canadian language particularly.

Fair market price is defined in 26 CFR § 1.170A-1( c)( 2) as “the rate at which residential or commercial property would change hands between a prepared purchaser and a prepared seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or to offer and both having reasonable knowledge of pertinent truths.” 26 CFR § 20.2031-1( b) broadens upon this meaning with “the fair market price of a particular item of residential or commercial property … is not to be figured out by a forced sale. Nor is the fair market value of a product to be figured out by the list price of the item in a market besides that in which such item is most typically offered to the public, taking into consideration the location of the item any place proper.”

The tax court in Anselmo v. Commission held that there should be no distinction between the definition of fair market price for various tax usages and for that reason the combined definition can be used in appraisals for non-cash charitable contributions.

IRS Publication 561, Determining the Value of Donated Residential Or Commercial Property, is the finest beginning point for guidance on identifying fair market worth. While federal regulations can appear difficult, the existing version (Rev. December 2024) is just 16 pages and uses clear headings to assist you find essential info rapidly. These ideas are likewise covered in the 2021 Core Course Manual, beginning at the bottom of page 12-2.

Table 1, found at the top of page 3 on IRS Publication 561, supplies a crucial and concise visual for figuring out fair market price. It lists the following considerations presented as a hierarchy, with the most dependable indications of fair market value listed first. In other words, the table is provided in a hierarchical order of the strongest arguments.

1. Cost or market price

1. Sales of similar residential or commercial properties
2. Replacement cost
3. Opinions of expert appraisers
   
   Let’s explore each consideration individually:
   
   1. Cost or Selling Price: The taxpayer’s expense or the actual selling cost received by a certified company (a company eligible to get tax-deductible charitable contributions under the Internal Revenue Code) might be the very best indicator of FMV, particularly if the transaction happened near the valuation date under common market conditions. This is most dependable when the sale was current, at arm’s length, both celebrations knew all pertinent realities, neither was under any compulsion, and market conditions stayed stable. 26 CFR § 1.482-1(b)( 1) specifies “arm’s length” as “a deal in between one celebration and an independent and unrelated celebration that is performed as if the two celebrations were complete strangers so that no conflict of interest exists.”
   
   This lines up with USPAP Standards Rule 8-2(a)(x)( 3 ), which states the appraiser must supply adequate information to indicate they adhered to the requirements of Standard 7 by “summarizing the results of analyzing the subject residential or commercial property’s sales and other transfers, agreements of sale, options, and listing when, in accordance with Standards Rule 7-5, it was required for credible task outcomes and if such information was available to the appraiser in the regular course of service.” Below, a remark additional states: “If such details is unobtainable, a declaration on the efforts carried out by the appraiser to acquire the info is required. If such information is irrelevant, a declaration acknowledging the existence of the details and mentioning its lack of relevance is needed.”
   
   The appraiser should ask for the purchase cost, source, and date of acquisition from the donor. While donors might be unwilling to share this information, it is required in Part I of Form 8283 and likewise appears in the IRS Preferred Appraisal Format for products valued over $50,000. Whether the donor decreases to supply these information, or the appraiser determines the details is not relevant, this ought to be plainly documented in the appraisal report.
   
   2. Sales of Comparable Properties: Comparable sales are among the most trusted and typically utilized methods for identifying FMV and are specifically convincing to intended users. The strength of this approach depends on a number of essential aspects:
   
   Similarity: The closer the equivalent is to the donated residential or commercial property, the more powerful the evidence. Adjustments need to be made for any differences in condition, quality, or other value appropriate attribute. Timing: Sales need to be as close as possible to the evaluation date. If you use older sales information, initially verify that market conditions have remained stable and that no more current equivalent sales are readily available. Older sales can still be used, but you should adjust for any modifications in market conditions to reflect the present value of the subject residential or commercial property. Sale Circumstances: The sale must be at arm’s length between informed, unpressured celebrations. Market Conditions: Sales must happen under regular market conditions and not throughout uncommonly inflated or depressed periods.
   
   To pick proper comparables, it is essential to completely comprehend the meaning of reasonable market price (FMV). FMV is the cost at which residential or commercial property would change hands between a willing buyer and a prepared seller, with neither celebration under pressure to act and both having sensible knowledge of the facts. This definition refers particularly to actual finished sales, not listings or estimates. Therefore, just offered outcomes must be used when figuring out FMV. Asking prices are simply aspirational and do not reflect a consummated transaction.
   
   In order to pick the most common market, the appraiser should think about a broader introduction where similar previously owned items (i.e., secondary market) are sold to the public. This usually narrows the focus to either auction sales or gallery sales-two unique markets with various dynamics. It is very important not to combine comparables from both, as doing so fails to clearly recognize the most common market for the subject residential or commercial property. Instead, you should consider both markets and after that pick the very best market and include comparables from that market.
   
   3. Replacement Cost: Replacement expense can be thought about when identifying FMV, however just if there’s an affordable connection in between an item’s replacement cost and its reasonable market value. Replacement cost refers to what it would cost to change the product on the assessment date. In numerous cases, the replacement expense far exceeds FMV and is not a dependable indication of worth. This technique is utilized occasionally.
   
   4. Opinions of expert appraisers: The IRS enables professional viewpoints to be considered when identifying FMV, but the weight provided depends upon the specialist’s certifications and how well the viewpoint is supported by facts. For the opinion to carry weight, it must be backed by credible proof (i.e., market data). This technique is used occasionally. Determining reasonable market price includes more than using a definition-it requires thoughtful analysis, sound approach, and dependable market data. By following IRS guidance and thinking about the facts and circumstances connected to the subject residential or commercial property, appraisers can produce conclusions that are well-supported. Upcoming posts in this series will further check out these principles through real-world applications and case examples.