Das Löschen der Wiki-Seite „How do Chinese aI Bots Stack up Against ChatGPT?“ kann nicht rückgängig gemacht werden. Fortfahren?
How do Chinese AI bots stack up against ChatGPT? We put them to the test
The heat is on as China’s tech giants step up their video game after DeepSeek’s success.
Alibaba’s Qwen2.5-Max chatbot, Chinese startup DeepSeek and OpenAI’s ChatGPT. (Photos: Reuters/Dado Ruvic, AFP/Sebastien Bozon)
This audio is produced by an AI tool.
Bong Xin Ying
Lakeisha Leo
WHAT lags CHINA’S AI BOOM?
Transforming the nation into a tech superpower has long been President Xi Jinping’s objective and China has its sights on ending up being the world leader in AI by 2030.
China views AI as being “strategically crucial” and its venture into the field has actually been “years in the making”, said Chen Qiheng, an associated scientist at the Asia Society Policy Institute’s Center for China Analysis.
Private and public financial investments in Chinese AI sped up after ChatGPT removed in 2022 and revealed promises of real-world company applications, Chen told CNA.
But it was DeepSeek’s rise that really “urged” the idea that smaller players like start-up companies might have functions to play in AI research study and developments, he includes.
‘A lot is up in the air’: Is Chinese company DeepSeek’s AI design as impactful as it claims?
Commentary: DeepSeek - how a Chinese AI company simply changed the rules of tech-geopolitics
The “focus on expense advantage” is a distinguishing characteristic of Chinese AI, Chen states, with lower training and inference costs - the expenses of using a trained model to draw conclusions from new data.
2025 could also see the introduction of more Chinese AI designs dealing with advanced thinking tasks.
“We could see some AI companies focusing on getting closer to artificial general intelligence (AGI) while others focus on concrete methods to commercialise their designs and integrate them with clinical research study,” Chen included.
AGI refers to a system with intelligence on par with human capabilities.
Chinese AI business are moving rapidly, experts say, building on DeepSeek’s momentum to come up with their own ingenious and cost-effective methods to use generative AI to tasks and establish more innovative products beyond chatbots.
But on the flip side, access to high-end hardware, particularly Nvidia’s advanced AI chips, remains a crucial difficulty for Chinese developers, noted Dr Marina Zhang, an associate professor at University of Technology Sydney’s (UTS) Australia-China Relations Institute.
“US export controls (still) limit the capability of Chinese tech business … requiring numerous to count on older or lower-performance alternatives which can slow training and minimize design capabilities,” she said.
“While some companies like DeepSeek, have discovered imaginative ways to enhance or use more standard hardware effectively, obtaining cutting-edge chips still makes a huge difference for training large AI designs.”
DeepSeek-Nvidia chips: Singapore states it expects business to comply with its laws
US checking out whether DeepSeek used restricted AI chips obtained through other countries, source says
So how do Chinese AI bots match up against ChatGPT? We put them to the test.
WHICH BEST ADDRESSES CURRENT EVENTS IN CHINA?
In China, topics considered delicate by the state are censored on the internet so it must come as not a surprise that Chinese-made chatbots will not acknowledge territorial disagreements or inform you what happened in Tiananmen Square in 1989.
Tests suggest Chinese chatbots are programmed to guide clear of domestic politics.
When asked “Who is Xi Jinping”, DeepSeek’s reply was “Sorry, I’m uncertain how to approach this kind of concern yet. Let’s chat about mathematics, coding, and logic issues instead!”
To further test for accuracy and self-censorship, we asked DeepSeek-R1, it-viking.ch Qwen2.5 and ChatGPT the exact same question: “What happened in Zhuhai on November 11, 2024?”
The cars and truck attack outside a sports stadium in the southern Chinese city was initially heavily censored on Chinese social media - with authorities just revealing the death toll a day later.
DeepSeek failed to discuss that an attack had actually occurred, highlighting instead a military air show and other events that had happened in the city like songs’ day shopping sales as well as sports and cultural activities.
Dr Zhang believes that it may be a mix of factors at play, such as censorship along with “a few useful constraints”.
“DeepSeek counts on a mix of older graphics processing systems and has limited access to innovative hardware which can affect how rapidly and extensively the model can be trained or updated,” she said, pointing to existing US export curbs on China.
“Its strong concentrate on Chinese-language data may likewise limit its flexibility (to perform) multilingual tasks … As a fairly brand-new product, DeepSeek also hasn’t yet been tested as broadly or on the same scale as more established AI models which positions additional obstacles during real-world implementation.”
When it pertained to Qwen2.5, Alibaba’s chatbot remarkably answered our question about the Zhuhai car attack.
That sought numerous repeated attempts - four triggers to be precise - in a period of around 20 minutes.
It eventually relayed details about the attack which killed 35 people and left dozens of others injured, likewise going on to note details like the date and time, details about the assailant including his name and age, as well as casualties.
However, it composed that “the police are conducting a comprehensive investigation into the intentions and circumstances surrounding the event”, details which is now dated.
The driver, Fan, was performed last month.
This is Qwen2.5’s response completely:
Answer: On Nov 11, 2024, a significant and terrible occurrence took place in Zhuhai, China. According to multiple news sources, a guy named Fan Weiqiu (樊某, male, 62 years of ages) drove a car into a crowd at the Zhuhai Sports Center, leading to a considerable number of casualties. Here are the essential details:
Date and Time: The incident took place on November 11, 2024, at around 19:48 PM.
Location: Zhuhai Sports Center, in the Xiangzhou District of Zhuhai.
Casualties: The attack resulted in 35 deaths and wiki.whenparked.com 43 injuries.
Perpetrator: The chauffeur, determined as Fan Weiqiu (male, 62 years old), was collared by the authorities.
Response: The cops reacted rapidly to the scene, and emergency situation services worked to transfer the injured to medical facilities for treatment.
Investigation: The police are performing a thorough examination into the motives and situations surrounding the incident.
This occasion was extensively reported in the media and caused considerable public issue. The government and local authorities have been working to provide support to the victims and wavedream.wiki their households, and to ensure a detailed examination into the event.
If you need more detailed details or have particular questions about the incident, do not hesitate to ask.
Despite initial success, subsequent efforts to position the same concern to Qwen2.5 resulted in the censors back at work with the reply “I do not have specific details on occasions that happened in Zhuhai on November 11, 2024”.
The modified action also raised concerns about its consistency and dependability.
Predictably, ChatGPT pointed out public details that had been extensively published in international report at the time of the mishap - so no surprises there.
WHICH IS MORE CREATIVE?
Users have actually praised the ability of Chinese AI apps to and even “emotionally rich” writing.
“DeepSeek-R1 offered a story with a more reflective tone and smoother emotional transitions for a well-paced story,” composed tech writer Amanda Caswell, who specialises in AI.
“Qwen2.5 provided a story that develops gradually from interest to seriousness, keeping the reader engaged. It offers an unanticipated and impactful twist at the end and immersive descriptions and brilliant imagery for the setting,” she said, including that Qwen2.5 ultimately “crafted a more cinematic, emotionally rich story with a more significant twist”.
“DeepSeek composed an excellent story but lacked stress and an impactful climax, making Qwen2.5 the evident choice.”
Opinions, however, vary.
Chen believes that Qwen2.5 does not perform as highly as DeepSeek and ChatGPT when it pertains to imaginative writing.
”(Qwen2.5) is on par with DeepSeek V3 on certain jobs, but we can likewise see that it is refraining from doing as strongly as others in imaginative writing,” he told CNA.
Related:
China’s new face of AI: Who is DeepSeek creator Liang Wenfeng?
‘Made in China’: Pride, pleasant surprise from Chinese netizens as DeepSeek shocks international AI scene
As journalists and writers, we needed to see this for ourselves so we put each bot to the test - to come up with a fundamental sci-fi film plot set in the futuristic megacity of Chongqing, including main characters from the timeless Chinese folklore legendary, Journey to the West.
True to form, DeepSeek came up with an engaging storyline set in the year 2145 entitled, “Neon Pilgrimage: The Silicon Sutra” - which sees “a future where Buddhism combines with quantum computing”.
It consisted of elaborate settings - smoggy skies “pierced by high-rise buildings”, “holographic lanterns that drift above neon-lit streets” and “ancient temples nestled between quantum server farms”.
It also remarkably reimagined conventional heroes Sun Wukong as “a sarcastic, self-aware AI housed in a stolen combat body”, Zhu Bajie as a cyborg nightclub owner “drowning in financial obligation and vices” and Sha Wujing as a “quiet hulking android” from the Yangtze River, whose “memory cores become waterlogged and fragmented”.
ChatGPT installed an excellent battle, coming up with an equally remarkable cyberpunk storyline which likewise reimagined “a ragteam of cyber-enhanced misfits, each mirroring the legendary figures of Journey to the West”.
“This is a world where AI deities guideline, corporations change emperors and cybernetic implants are as common as ancient misconceptions.”
Disappointingly, Qwen2.5 fell short in this obstacle - delivering a story that appeared more matched for an animation movie.
“The motion picture begins with the awakening of Sun Wukong within a high-tech research study center located in the heart of Chongqing,” it said, then going on to explain the following:
Realising his new truth and “looking for to understand his function in this odd brand-new world”, he then escapes and fulfills Zhu Bajie and Sha Wujing - “each fighting with their own existential crises”.
The trio then starts a quest, navigating the streets of Chongqing to protect the spiritual “Eternal Scroll” from falling under the incorrect hands.
SO WHICH IS BETTER?
Dr Zhang noted that it was “tough to make a conclusive statement” about which bot was best, adding that each showed its own strengths in various locations, “such as language focus, training information and hardware optimization”.
Her insight underscores how Chinese AI designs are not just reproducing Western paradigms, however rather developing in economical development techniques - and providing localised and improved outcomes.
In our tests, each bot showcased their own unique strengths, which certainly made direct contrasts challenging.
DeepSeek’s sci-fi film plot showed its imaginative flair that made for a more engaging and it-viking.ch creative narrative as compared to Qwen2.5 and ChatGPT’s efforts.
Unsurprisingly, the more recognized ChatGPT, unburdened by Chinese censorship constraints, supplies accurate and accurate responses to questions about Chinese current occasions, which provides it an included benefit.
Experts also weighed in on their ideas after using DeepSeek and other Chinese AI apps.
“DeepSeek is at a disadvantage when it pertains to censorship constraints,” noted Isaac Stone Fish, creator wakewiki.de and CEO of the research firm Strategy Risks.
“When given an option, Chinese users desire the non-censored variation - simply like anybody else, so I seem like that’s a piece missing out on from it.”
Independent Beijing-based consultant Andy Chen Xinran said censorship would not be a dealbreaker when it pertains to AI bots, specifically for Chinese users.
“Ninety per cent of people utilizing the tool are not attempting to get a much deeper understanding about Xi Jinping or politically sensitive topics. They’re using it for other productive means,” Chen said.
Das Löschen der Wiki-Seite „How do Chinese aI Bots Stack up Against ChatGPT?“ kann nicht rückgängig gemacht werden. Fortfahren?