Secure.gov sites utilize HTTPS A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// indicates you’ve securely connected to the.gov site. Share delicate info only on official, safe and secure sites.

- About - The Attorney General

• Organizational Chart
• Budget & Performance
• History
• Privacy Program
  
  - Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos
• Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Why Justice?
• Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies
• Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  Utilities
  
  - About About
  
  Our Work
  
  - Contact the Division Contact the Division
  
  Report an Offense
  
  - Cases and Matters
• Press Room Press Room
  
  Videos
  
  Publications
  
  - Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
  
  Experienced Professionals
  
  Chief law officer ´ s Honors Program
  
  Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
  
  - Civil Rights FOIA Civil Rights FOIA
  
  Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
  
  - En español
  
  - About - title=” About” About
• The Chief law officer
• Organizational Chart
• Budget & Performance
• History
• Privacy Program
  
  - title=” News” News
• Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos
• Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - title=” Guidance & Resources” Resources
• Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Employment
• Why Justice?
• Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies - Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  - Our Offices
• Find Help
• Contact Us
  
  Breadcrumb
  
  1. Justice.gov
• Civil Liberty Division
• The Fair Housing Act
  
  The Fair Housing Act
  
  - Facebook
• X.
• LinkedIn.
• Email
  
  The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., restricts discrimination by direct service providers of housing, such as property managers and real estate business as well as other entities, such as towns, banks or other loan provider and homeowners insurance provider whose inequitable practices make housing unavailable to persons since of:
  
  race or color. religion. sex. national origin. familial status, or. .
  
  In cases involving discrimination in mortgage loans or home enhancement loans, the Department might file match under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is proof of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a rejection of rights to a group of persons raises a concern of basic public significance. Where force or hazard of force is used to deny or interfere with fair housing rights, the Department of Justice might set up criminal proceedings. The Fair Housing Act likewise supplies treatments for managing private problems of discrimination. Individuals who believe that they have actually been victims of an illegal housing practice, might file a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or file their own suit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings suits on behalf of individuals based upon referrals from HUD.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
  
  Among the main objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to prohibit race discrimination in sales and rentals of housing. Nevertheless, more than thirty years later on, race discrimination in housing continues to be an issue. The bulk of the Justice Department’s pattern or practice cases involve claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing companies attempt to disguise their discrimination by providing false details about availability of housing, either stating that absolutely nothing was offered or steering homeseekers to specific areas based upon race. Individuals who receive such false information or misdirection might have no knowledge that they have actually been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has actually brought many cases declaring this sort of discrimination based upon race or color. In addition, the Department’s Fair Housing Testing Program seeks to reveal this sort of surprise discrimination and hold those responsible accountable. The majority of the mortgage lending cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have alleged discrimination based upon race or color. A few of the Department’s cases have also declared that towns and other city government entities broke the Fair Housing Act when they denied licenses or zoning changes for housing advancements, or relegated them to predominantly minority communities, since the potential citizens were anticipated to be predominantly African-Americans.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
  
  The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination in housing based upon religion. This restriction covers instances of overt discrimination versus members of a particular religious beliefs also less direct actions, such as zoning regulations created to restrict making use of personal homes as a places of praise. The number of cases filed given that 1968 declaring religious discrimination is small in contrast to some of the other prohibited bases, such as race or national origin. The Act does include a restricted exception that permits non-commercial housing operated by a spiritual organization to reserve such housing to individuals of the exact same faith.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Unwanted Sexual Advances
  
  The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. In current years, the Department’s focus in this area has been to challenge unwanted sexual advances in housing. Women, especially those who are poor, and with limited housing alternatives, frequently have little recourse however to tolerate the embarrassment and deterioration of unwanted sexual advances or threat having their households and themselves got rid of from their homes. The Department’s enforcement program is aimed at property managers who produce an untenable living environment by requiring sexual favors from tenants or by producing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this manner we look for both to get relief for tenants who have been treated unfairly by a landlord since of sex and also discourage other potential abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without facing effects. In addition, rates discrimination in mortgage lending might also adversely affect women, especially minority females. This type of discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
  
  The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the country of an individual’s birth or where his or her ancestors come from. Census data suggest that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing section of our nation’s population. The Justice Department has taken enforcement action versus community federal governments that have attempted to decrease or restrict the number of Hispanic families that may reside in their neighborhoods. We have actually sued loan providers under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have imposed more rigid underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less beneficial terms for Hispanic debtors. The Department has also sued lending institutions for discrimination versus Native Americans. Other locations of the nation have actually experienced an increasing diversity of nationwide origin groups within their populations. This includes new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the previous Soviet Union, and other portions of Eastern Europe. We have taken action versus private proprietors who have actually discriminated versus such individuals.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
  
  The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, restricts discrimination in housing versus families with children under 18. In addition to forbiding a straight-out rejection of housing to families with kids, the Act also avoids housing companies from enforcing any special requirements or conditions on tenants with custody of children. For example, proprietors may not find households with children in any single portion of a complex, place an unreasonable limitation on the overall number of individuals who may reside in a dwelling, or limit their access to recreational services provided to other occupants. In most instances, the modified Fair Housing Act prohibits a housing company from refusing to lease or sell to households with children. However, some centers might be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This type of housing, which fulfills the requirements stated in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, may operate as “senior” housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has actually published guidelines and extra assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
  
  The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all kinds of housing deals. The Act defines persons with a special needs to imply those people with mental or physical impairments that significantly limit one or more major life activities. The term psychological or physical impairment may consist of conditions such as loss of sight, hearing problems, movement problems, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcoholism, drug addiction, persistent fatigue, learning special needs, head injury, and psychological health problem. The term major life activity might include seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, performing manual jobs, taking care of one’s self, discovering, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act likewise secures individuals who have a record of such an impairment, or are considered as having such a problems. Current users of prohibited regulated substances, individuals founded guilty for illegal manufacture or distribution of a controlled compound, sex transgressors, and juvenile culprits are ruled out handicapped under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act manages no securities to people with or without disabilities who present a direct threat to the individuals or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether somebody postures such a direct hazard must be made on an individualized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based upon basic presumptions or speculation about the nature of a disability. The Division’s enforcement of the Fair Housing Act’s securities for persons with disabilities has focused on 2 major areas. One is guaranteeing that zoning and other guidelines worrying land use are not utilized to prevent the property options of these individuals, including needlessly restricting communal, or gather, property arrangements, such as group homes. The second location is guaranteeing that freshly built multifamily housing is integrated in accordance with the Fair Housing Act’s accessibility requirements so that it is available to and functional by people with impairments, and, in particular, those who utilize wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that restrict discrimination against individuals with specials needs, consisting of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is enforced by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
  
  Some individuals with impairments might live together in congregate living plans, often described as “group homes.” The Fair Housing Act forbids towns and other local government entities from making zoning or land use decisions or implementing land use policies that omit or otherwise victimize individuals with disabilities. The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal--
  
  - To utilize land usage policies or actions that deal with groups of individuals with disabilities less favorably than groups of non-disabled persons. An example would be an ordinance restricting housing for persons with disabilities or a particular type of special needs, such as psychological health problem, from finding in a specific location, while enabling other groups of unrelated people to cohabit in that location.
• To take action versus, or deny an authorization, for a home since of the disability of individuals who live or would live there. An example would be denying a structure license for a home since it was intended to provide housing for persons with mental retardation.
• To decline to clear up accommodations in land use and zoning policies and treatments where such lodgings might be necessary to manage individuals or groups of individuals with impairments a level playing field to use and take pleasure in housing. What makes up an affordable accommodation is a case-by-case determination. Not all requested adjustments of rules or policies are sensible. If an asked for modification enforces an undue monetary or administrative problem on a city government, or if an adjustment produces a basic modification in a city government’s land use and zoning scheme, it is not a “reasonable” lodging.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
  nove.team
  The Fair Housing Act specifies discrimination in housing versus individuals with impairments to consist of a failure “to create and build” certain brand-new multi-family homes so that they are available to and functional by individuals with specials needs, and particularly people who utilize wheelchairs. The Act needs all recently built multi-family dwellings of 4 or more systems intended for very first tenancy after March 13, 1991, to have particular features: an accessible entryway on an accessible path, accessible typical and public usage locations, doors adequately wide to accommodate wheelchairs, available routes into and through each residence, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats in accessible location, reinforcements in restroom walls to accommodate grab bar installations, and functional bathroom and kitchens set up so that a wheelchair can steer about the area.
  
  Developers, builders, owners, and designers responsible for the style or construction of brand-new multi-family housing may be held liable under the Fair Housing Act if their structures stop working to meet these design requirements. The Department of Justice has actually brought numerous enforcement actions against those who failed to do so. The majority of the cases have actually been resolved by authorization decrees offering a variety of types of relief, including: retrofitting to bring unattainable functions into compliance where practical and where it is not-- options (monetary funds or other building and construction requirements) that will offer making other housing units accessible